Party Wall Act Misunderstandings
Hourican Associates Ltd |
In London, properties are close together: Victorian terraces share walls, mansion blocks share floors and ceilings, and basement or rear extension excavations can sit just centimetres from a neighbour’s foundations. That’s why the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 matters. It provides a legal framework to help prevent and resolve neighbour disputes where certain building works could affect a shared wall, shared structure, boundary wall, or nearby foundations.
Despite being a well-established piece of legislation, we still see the same misunderstandings slow down projects across Chelsea, Kensington, Fulham, Wandsworth, Westminster and beyond. This guide explains the most common myths—so you can keep your build compliant, neighbourly, and on programme.
What the Party Wall Act does (and what it doesn’t)
- It creates a formal process for notifying neighbours (adjoining owners) about certain categories of work and for resolving disputes via surveyors.
- It is separate from planning permission and building regulations—having one does not remove the need to comply with the others.
- It is usually a civil matter between owners. Local authorities do not typically “approve” party wall notices.
- It does not usually give a blanket veto over lawful works. Instead, it sets safeguards (timing, access, protections, and remedies) where the Act applies.
London projects that commonly trigger the Act
| Typical London project | Why it’s often notifiable | Related guidance |
|---|---|---|
| Loft conversion (steel beams into a party wall) | Works to an existing party wall or party structure can be notifiable | Loft conversion party wall surveys |
| Rear extension foundations | Excavations close to a neighbour’s structure may be notifiable (distance/depth dependent) | Rear extension party wall guidance |
| Basement excavation / underpinning | Higher-risk adjacent excavation + potential works to party structures | Basement party wall surveys |
| Chimney breast removal on a party wall | Directly affects the shared wall/structure | Chimney removal advice |
| Building at/near the boundary | New walls at the line of junction can require notice | Party Wall Notices |
The 12 most common misunderstandings (and the compliant reality)
1) “It’s on my land, so the Act can’t apply.”
In London, this is a frequent surprise on rear extensions and basements. Even if you never touch a shared wall, excavations for foundations can still be notifiable where they fall within the Act’s criteria. The correct approach is to assess the distance and depth of excavation in relation to the adjoining structure.
2) “Planning permission means I can start.”
Party wall procedures are separate from planning and building control. You may need to comply with all relevant regimes. A common London delay is booking contractors in, then discovering notices and surveyor procedures still need to run.
3) “My neighbour agreed in person—no notice needed.”
A friendly conversation is always sensible, but where the Act applies, notices are typically required and consent is best recorded in writing. Serving a valid notice protects both owners by clarifying what is proposed and when.
4) “No reply means consent.”
This is one of the most damaging myths. For many notices, if there is no written consent within the statutory response period, the matter is treated as a dispute and surveyor appointment procedures apply. In practice, this can mean you cannot lawfully proceed with the notifiable parts of the work until the process is resolved.
5) “Any email/WhatsApp message is a valid Party Wall Notice.”
Notices must contain required information and be served on the correct people. London ownership is often complex—freeholders, long leaseholders and multiple flats can mean multiple qualifying owners. Getting the recipients wrong is a common reason for re-service and delays.
6) “A party wall is only the wall between two houses.”
Not necessarily. In conversions and blocks, party structures can include floors and other separating elements. And a “party fence wall” is generally a masonry boundary wall (not a timber fence panel). Misidentifying the structure can lead to the wrong notice (or none).
7) “A Party Wall Award is optional paperwork.”
If there is dissent (or treated dissent), an Award is commonly the document that sets out the notifiable works, safeguards, access arrangements, and how damage will be handled. On higher-risk London projects (e.g., basements), it is often a key risk-control tool for both owners.
8) “Surveyors are ‘on one side’ like solicitors.”
Party wall surveyors operate within a statutory dispute resolution procedure. Where appropriate, owners can agree to appoint an Agreed Surveyor to act impartially for both parties.
9) “My neighbour can block my entire project.”
The Act is not designed as a blanket veto. It is a framework to manage risk and resolve disputes about notifiable works. However, outcomes depend on facts: for example, unsafe methods, inadequate protection, or unlawful proposals can still create serious issues. Proper documents and professional input matter.
10) “Party wall costs are always split 50/50.”
Cost allocation depends on why works are being done and whether additional works are requested for another owner’s benefit. Many domestic projects are funded by the building owner because the works are for their benefit, but it is not a one-size-fits-all rule.
11) “We don’t need a Schedule of Condition if we’re on good terms.”
Even with good relationships, disputes can arise once works begin—especially in older London housing stock with pre-existing hairline cracking or historic movement. A Schedule of Condition provides an agreed baseline record and can reduce conflict.
12) “If I need access for scaffolding, I can just use my neighbour’s land.”
Access rights under the Act are limited and should be planned carefully. Where access is genuinely necessary for notifiable works, it should be properly notified, documented, and managed to minimise inconvenience and maintain neighbour relations.
Common London timing pitfalls (and how to avoid them)
The Act includes minimum notice periods for different categories of work and response windows. If you serve notices late, your contractor programme may be unrealistic—especially where a dispute arises and surveyor procedures are needed. The simplest fix is to assess party wall requirements as soon as drawings are developed.
| Step | What happens | Why it matters in London |
|---|---|---|
| Serve a valid notice | Notice must go to all relevant adjoining owners with the required project information | London often has multiple owners (freeholder + long leaseholder(s)) |
| Adjoining owner response window | Written consent, dissent, or no reply (which may be treated as a dispute for many notices) | Absentee owners and managing agents can slow responses |
| If a dispute arises | Surveyor(s) are appointed and (where needed) an Award is agreed/served | Basements and tight sites often need more detailed safeguards |
Transparent fees (London)
Party Wall Notice Service: from £150 + VAT per adjoining owner
Schedule of Condition Surveys: typically £385–£585 + VAT (depending on size/works; basements priced separately)
Full Party Wall Award: typically £1100–£1500 + VAT (scope dependent)
Fees vary by property type, number of owners, complexity, and the information available (drawings, structural details, method statements). This is pricing guidance only; a written quotation will confirm scope and cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Richard Hourican, Company Director
BSc (Hons). HND Build. MCIOB. C.Build E MCABE. ARICS. MFPWS. MPTS
As a specialist Party Wall surveyor, Richard Hourican will protect your interests during building works.
Are you planning a building project – perhaps an extension, loft conversion or basement – that is on or adjacent to your property’s boundary line? Or has a ‘Party Wall’ notice dropped on the doormat informing you of a neighbour’s impending works?
It’s essential to understand all the implications of building plans. If you don’t, it could cost thousands. Our job is to ensure everything is done correctly – and that it doesn’t!
Follow us:
